Monday, March 26, 2012

A Thai Treat

By Rachael Bardfield, staff reporter



With an open mind and an empty stomach, I recently ventured to the Thai House on 304 Main Street, Hyannis, to soothe my craving for oriental cuisine. I have always been biased towards oriental food: the salty, rich and indulgent dishes that leave you in a food coma even after digestion. To my surprise, the menu at the Thai House was quite vast, ranging from sea foods to meats with my choice of a variety of sauces. Curries are an aspect different from Chinese food, light and flavored with curry powder and spices, with Thai House hosting 5 different types. What truly caught my eye was the deal of a century- the Combo meals that came with a choice of two appetizers and a main dish for $8.95. It was hard to choose from the variety of pad thai and curries to fried rice. When my meal arrived, I feasted my eyes upon a stacking plate of colorful vegetables, chicken, and a tasty red curry sauce- Combo Number 4. And it tasted just as good as it looked! I felt full and satisfied but not groggy after my meal reassuring me that Thai House uses fresh ingredients. The meal came fast and my bill left an accomplished smile on my face. I would strongly suggest Thai House for the perfect spot for Thai at the right price.

Thursday, March 22, 2012

Watership Down a Rare Treasure

by Alicia Pollard, staff reporter


Watership Down is one of those rare treasures that hide behind a humble appearance seemingly dull premise: a book about rabbits sounds dry at best, but is a poor description of Richard Adams’ incredible story. Watership Down is a window into a captivating world where men are one of a thousand enemies, survival is paramount but precarious, and the veil between natural and supernatural unravels. The language, characters and storyline are so vivid as to make them as real as the reader’s armchair: the tension of escaping an unknown doom, one rabbit’s tenuous, frightened possession of the second sight, and the peril of escaping an evil, prison-like warren. Adams masterfully blends the portrayal of a rabbit’s life with the humor, courage and friendship of humans.
            Adams’ rich language is vibrant in its description yet clear in its expression. Without dragging down the story with boring digressions, he lets portraits of wildlife’s beauty steal into the action so that both the peace of quiet moments and the tension of dangerous ones come alive. Though avoiding elaborate, clumsy wording, phrases such as “sunset…red in clouds” (12) and “far land of wild mountains”(356) catch the reader’s imagination yet disappear into the intertwinement of setting and atmosphere.  He describes but the characters’ feelings with a gentle, meditative tone and descriptions such as “delightful sense of security” (89) that keeps the omniscience of a narrator and the temperament of the character.
            The characters in Watership Down are charming and realistic, with the instincts and aims of rabbits but the flaws and strengths of humans. Hazel’s wise yet humble leadership, Bigwig’s proud but frank toughness, and Blackberry’s quiet ingenuity are endearing and entertaining. Adams has also made his villains as real as his heroes: heartless and ignorant as Cowslip and Strawberry, or cruel and calculating as General Woundwort and his Council – all as terrifying as complex, realistic villains should be. The characters are engaging from the first page and continue to captivate the reader as they grow and develop.
            One of the most fascinating elements of Watership Down is how Adams has woven culture into the rabbit’s lives. From explanations about the world’s beginning to why some litters miscarriage, the rabbit folktales sprinkled throughout the story are entertaining and enhance the main plot. The glimpses into the mystery of the folktale’s truthfulness also bind them to the central storyline: Fiver’s truthful prophecies, the storm which helped Bigwig and his fugitives escape from General Woundwort, and Vilthuril’s retelling of one of Hazel’s adventures as a folktale all speak of a society shaped by love of trickery and desire to survive. This colorful description of an animal culture so akin to human culture enriches each character.
            Watership Down is simple enough for young and older readers to enjoy, yet rich with imagery, language and characters that become three-dimensional from the first page. Adam’s work lets readers experience the thrill of an adventure and the deeper meaning of a quest.

2012 Olympic Logo Sparks Controversy

By Meghan Agostinelli, staff reporter 



            Every four years, the world unites to celebrate the Summer Olympics, and summer 2012 will be no exception. However, this year’s Summer Olympics will not arrive without controversy regarding its logo.
            When the logo for both the London Summer Olympic Games and the Paralympic Games was first unveiled in June 2007, there was immediate controversy. According to a BBC poll given shortly after the logo’s release, approximately eighty percent of voters strongly disliked the design. Some expressed dislike because they believed that it looked similar to the Nazi swastika. Others argued that the logo, which was designed by well-known brand consultancy Wolff Olins, was too universal and should contain a symbol that represents London such as the Tower of London or Big Ben.
            The largest recent controversy, however, was in early 2011 when Iran threatened to withdraw from the Summer 2012 Olympics because they claimed that the logo is racist. The Iranian government has contended that the logo spells Zion, a biblical reference to Jerusalem, and thus suggests pro-Israeli sentiments. As of yet though, Iran has not chosen to boycott the 2012 Olympic Games.
            I agree with the logo’s protestors that it is not aesthetically appealing in its blue, green, orange, and pink design. London 2012 Olympic Chairman Lord Sebastian Coe has stated that the color palette was chosen in hopes of appealing to younger generations, but, as a member of one of these generations, the colors do not pique my interest. I believe that a much more attractive design could have been created for the same price of 400,000 euros. Still, despite dislike for the physical appearance of the logo, I realize its significance, and I hope that others who dislike the appearance can also appreciate its importance.
            The purpose of the Olympic logo is to be a symbol which unites the world. Do we really need to make such a big deal out of what we see the logo as? So what if the London 2012 design does not show a London-unique feature? Isn’t the logo supposed to be universal? So what if you interpret the logo as this or that? Can you please just accept the fact that a logo is a logo and nothing more? The creators of the design wanted the figure to represent 2012, and citizens of various countries around the world need not interpret it in different ways.
            After all, the Summer Olympic Games only come every four years. We cannot let our discontent over the logo overshadow the importance of its purpose.